copying

[Aristotle nods. -- GAP]

~*~

This is a syndicated post, which originally appeared at Mimi and Eunice » IPView original post.

Print This Post
Share

{ 0 comments }

So it looks like a recently published spy thriller, Assassin of Secrets, was largely plagiarized by the “author” from quite a few other novels — some post-Fleming Bond novels and others.

Now, when someone like myself says he is against intellectual “property,” as an illegitimate government grant of monopoly privilege over something that cannot be owned (i.e., ideas), the responses are fairly predictable.

A common one is “Well, then what’s to stop me from copying your novel, changing the name on it, and selling it as my own?”

Well, your customers could sue you for fraud, for one thing. No need for copyright to make that possible.

For another, in the Internet age, you run a very high risk of being found out and ruining your reputation.

In this case, fans of James Bond novels discovered the plagiarism first. As you can imagine, fans can be mighty protective of their favorite books and authors. Try to rip one off and some fan is bound to spot it, and soon they’ll all be royally pissed.

[Keep reading…]

Print This Post
Share

{ 0 comments }

I’ve been hearing a lot of stupid arguments lately.

This is a syndicated post, which originally appeared at Mimi and Eunice » IPView original post.

Print This Post
Share

{ 1 comment }

Mimi & Eunice: Can’t Buy Love

by Nina Paley April 13, 2011

[...] . . . → Read More: Can’t Buy Love

Read the full article →

Mimi & Eunice: Un-Original Business Model

by Nina Paley April 9, 2011

Apparently a few quilters who leave troll comments [...] . . . → Read More: Un-Original Business Model

Read the full article →

Mimi & Eunice: Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal

by Nina Paley April 6, 2011

This is usually attributed to Pablo Picasso, but I’ [...] . . . → Read More: Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal

Read the full article →

Article: Intellectual Freedom and Learning Versus Patent and Copyright

by Stephan Kinsella January 20, 2011

In my various publications and speeches about intellectual property (IP), I’ve approached it from a variety of angles. In this article, I consider the role of information and learning, and the role of property rights, in human action. I use a praxeological analysis to show that human action employs scarce resources or means, but that [...]

Read the full article →