Should Parents Need a License to Procreate? A Moron Says Yes.

Hugh LaFollette, “Licensing Parents Revisited,” Journal of Applied Philosophy.¹

The premise of his article is that the legitimacy of professional licensing is well-established and the practice should be expanded to parents.

While one could argue that it doesn’t follow from professional licensing being applied to various professions that it should be expanded to parents, this article is really illustrative of why libertarians should oppose professional licensure outright.

It’s a slippery slope from licensing florists to licensing parents.² Once you concede the legitimacy of some licensing, then more outrageous nonsense inevitably follows.

Endnotes

1. Anytime you see the words “applied philosophy” or “applied ethics” together and the article isn’t written by a libertarian, it is safe to assume it contains some nonsense like environmental socialism, Big Brother or nanny statist stuff like this or national health care or other social-welfare programs, calls for government to make businesses more socially responsible, and so on. [↩]
2. No offense, my home state of Louisiana. Why we need to be protected from bad floral arrangements is beyond me. What professional licensing is really about is restricting competition in order to protect existing players in the market; which, not incidentally, is what the state-granted monopoly privilege called intellectual property is about too. [↩]

About Geoffrey Allan Plauché  (63 Posts)

Geoffrey is an Aristotelian-Liberal political philosopher, an adjunct instructor for Buena Vista University, the founder and executive editor of Prometheus Unbound: A Libertarian Review of Fiction and Literature, and the webmaster of The Libertarian Standard. His work has appeared in Libertarian Papers, the Journal of Libertarian Studies, the Journal of Value Inquiry, and Transformers and Philosophy. He lives in Cold Spring, KY with his wife and two children.

Related Posts

1. Road Socialism Leads to Broadband Socialism
2. Should Marriage Licenses Be Restricted to Heterosexuals?
3. The Corrosive Effects of IP
4. Intellectual Property: A Simple Example
5. All Your Tubes Are Belong to Googlizon

Tagged as: applied ethics, applied philosophy, Big Brother, big government, competition, Corporatism, environmental socialism, florists, Hugh LaFollette, intellectual property, IP, Journal of Applied Philosophy, libertarianism, licensing florists, licensing parents, Louisiana, morons, Nanny Statism, parents, philodoxers, philosophers, professional licensure, restricting competition, slippery slopes, social responsibility, sophists, Victimless Crimes, welfare statism