Paley & Doctorow argue over Non-Commercial licenses

by on September 1, 2010 @ 10:07 am · 1 comment

in IP Law

Nina Paley, a creative artist and anti-copyright innovator, creator of Sita Sings the Blues (see The Creator-Endorsed Mark as an Alternative to Copyright; Interview: Nina Paley on Copyright; Nina Paley’s “All Creative Work is Derivative”; Power to the Pixel 2009: Nina Paley), has posted on her blog a fascinating exchange with Cory Doctorow about the merits of using the Creator-Endorsed Mark (see my post The Creator-Endorsed Mark as an Alternative to Copyright) instead of more restrictive, copyright-based licenses.

About Stephan Kinsella  (151 Posts)

Stephan is an attorney and libertarian writer in Houston, Director of the Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF), and the founder and editor of Libertarian Papers. His most recent book is Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (co-editor, with Jörg Guido Hülsmann; Mises Institute, 2009).


Related Posts

  1. New Syndicated Series: Nina Paley’s Mimi and Eunice Webcomic
  2. Nina Paley on Property, Copyleft, Copyright at HOPE 2010
  3. Cory Doctorow: The coming war on general computation
  4. Good Guys and Bad Guys in the Media Biz
  5. A New Approach to Commercial Publishing: The New LFB
Print This Post
Share

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Geoffrey Allan Plauché September 1, 2010 at 12:38 pm

From Nina’s post:

If getting money for the artist is the primary concern, the Creator Endorsed Mark should offer reassurance, as should my own experience. You said that my experience with Sita offers “only one data point,”

Funny that Cory said that. Couldn’t the same thing be said of his Creative Commons ebook experiment?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Read This Before Leaving a Comment

Please keep the following in mind when commenting:

  • Real names preferred but not required.
  • If your comment contains several links, your comment may be held up for a while in moderation; please, be patient.
  • Strive for the ideal speech situation: civility, mutual understanding, no eristic debating tactics, no ad hominems, no foul language.

Comments that do not adhere to the last item above will be deleted or marked as SPAM at our discretion.

 

» Comments RSS Feed

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

{ 3 trackbacks }

  • Dark Politricks RT

    RT @libstandard New blogpost: The Libertarian Standard » Paley & Doctorow argue over Non-Commercial licenses | http://bit.ly/bYRbYl

    September 1, 2010
  • LibertarianMinds

    Paley & Doctorow argue over Non-Commercial licenses http://ff.im/-q3Kz6

    September 1, 2010
  • Punk Johnny Cash

    Paley & Doctorow argue over Non-Commercial licenses http://trunc.it/aufzh

    September 1, 2010

Previous post:

Next post: