The Death Throes of Pro-IP Libertarianism

by on July 28, 2010 @ 10:15 am · 2 comments

in IP Law, Libertarian Theory

death throes of an archaeopteryxMy article, “The Death Throes of Pro-IP Libertarianism,” was published on Mises Daily today. Also published today on Mises Daily is a reprint of Wendy McElroy’s great, classic “Copyright and Patent in Benjamin Tucker’s Periodical Liberty.”

Updates:

Amusing: on the “Christian Pipe Smokers” site (hunh?), one guy links to my article and says “This is so beautifully written I had to share it.” Another replies: “Okay to be nice I started reading it. I got half way and wanted to blow my brains out. That was stupidly and poorly written. After getting half way I was lost having no idea what he was talking about. … If yer reading crap like this all the time it is no wonder your politics are screwed up.”

Also, mentioned in Where should anarchists stand on IP? (FreeDissent); my comment was:

Thanks for the plug, but correct, I don’t regard myself as a right-libertarian. I despise the right, and also the left. We libertarians are neither right nor left.

I’m nonreligious, pro-gay-marriage, pro-open-borders, pro-tolerance/cosmopolitan values, pro-drug legalization, anti-state, anti-war, and anti-IP. And I even like chardonnay. I am not sure how that makes me “right.” I doubt they would have me.

Also discussed on Freesteader.

And in an excellent post, The Decline of the Randian Influence on American Libertarianism?

About Stephan Kinsella  (151 Posts)

Stephan is an attorney and libertarian writer in Houston, Director of the Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF), and the founder and editor of Libertarian Papers. His most recent book is Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (co-editor, with Jörg Guido Hülsmann; Mises Institute, 2009).


Related Posts

  1. Mimi & Eunice: Death of the Author
  2. Article: Intellectual Freedom and Learning Versus Patent and Copyright
  3. Progressive Egalitarians Should Be Anti-IP
  4. Kinsella on Intellectual Property and Economic Development
  5. Rethinking Intellectual Property: History, Theory, and Economics
Print This Post
Share

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Misty Khan July 29, 2010 at 12:50 pm

Too funny, Steph! I’m a little worried about this chardonnay thing though – will have to rethink Kinsellianism now. ;-D

Reply

2 HL July 29, 2010 at 1:52 pm

Pro-open borders?? I cry. You’re still my hero, just a little tarnished.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Read This Before Leaving a Comment

Please keep the following in mind when commenting:

  • Real names preferred but not required.
  • If your comment contains several links, your comment may be held up for a while in moderation; please, be patient.
  • Strive for the ideal speech situation: civility, mutual understanding, no eristic debating tactics, no ad hominems, no foul language.

Comments that do not adhere to the last item above will be deleted or marked as SPAM at our discretion.

 

» Comments RSS Feed

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

{ 3 trackbacks }

  • Russell Madden’s “The Death Throes of Pro-IP Libertarianism”

    [...] Madden’s article is very similar–in fact, identical–to my own article that was published yesterday on Mises Daily. The content appears to be very similar to mine too–in other words, it’s [...]

    July 29, 2010
  • Leveraging IP

    [...] in one stroke. Of course, Big Pharma, and pro-IP libertarians (even if they are, thankfully, a dwindling breed), would strenuously oppose patent [...]

    August 2, 2010
  • Kinsella in Swedish

    [...] As I wrote in reply, “I am not surprised the article got a lot of discussion. IP posts routinely get the most comments on the Mises Blog (it’s over 400 comments now for one published 2 days ago: The Death Throes of Pro-IP Libertarianism). [...]

    August 2, 2010

Previous post:

Next post: